From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=X_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E595BC6C for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:16:23 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAHkVoEeFCzLHiGdsb2JhbACQGg0BAQEICggJGJ8z X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,277,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="7431922" Received: from mail0.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp ([133.11.50.199]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2008 15:16:22 +0100 Received: from spam002.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (spam002.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.50.195]) by mail0.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695371BE8011 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:16:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from [192.168.0.92] (219.1.172.174 [219.1.172.174]) by spam002.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (SpamBlock.pst 3.4.102) with ESMTP id <6C34A973-63CC-4488-A25D-29FF5E69E6C2@mist.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp> for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:15:56 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) In-Reply-To: <200801300757.06928.ober.14@osu.edu> References: <4BD387EA-7017-494A-AF01-D8216EE22501@mist.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <4b5157c30801291342r2094969r8f3497d9a82aea4d@mail.gmail.com> <117FCC0D-D466-4F67-8171-B0D5E4CD168F@erratique.ch> <200801300757.06928.ober.14@osu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6C34A973-63CC-4488-A25D-29FF5E69E6C2@mist.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Keisuke Nakano Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Palindromic Quine Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:15:38 +0900 To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) X-IP: 219.1.172.174 X-FROM-DOMAIN: mist.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp X-FROM-EMAIL: ksk@mist.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp X-Spam: no; 0.00; u-tokyo:01 author's:01 cheers:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 constraint:01 constraint:01 guess:04 submission:05 standard:07 correctness:08 approach:08 correct:08 correct:08 error:12 On 2008/01/30, at 21:57, Kuba Ober wrote: > I guess the contest designers have to decide one way or the other > on the "it > must be a correct program" constraint. The only constraint for correctness is 'to be accepted by the server'. The contest server automatically and immediately judges submitted programs whether it is correct or not. If the submission is correct, the server will add the author's name to the ranking. The error message approach, even if it is palindromic, will be rejected because the server does not observe the standard error. Cheers, Keisuke.