From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A30EC7EE80 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:23:19 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuEBAAm9TFFKN1ZKkWdsb2JhbABDhRGDHL0rgXsOAQEBAQkLEhQogiUBBSNWEAsaAiYCAkcQIYgMBK94kiWBI408MwcWghcyYQOcTxOOEQ X-IPAS-Result: AuEBAAm9TFFKN1ZKkWdsb2JhbABDhRGDHL0rgXsOAQEBAQkLEhQogiUBBSNWEAsaAiYCAkcQIYgMBK94kiWBI408MwcWghcyYQOcTxOOEQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,893,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="7521971" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2013 21:23:17 +0100 Received: from [172.20.10.2] (81-235.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.235.81]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1BD20AB224; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:23:10 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: jon@ffconsultancy.com Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <6C6F2DEFCC284DE9BB3ECC2A62FC8BD6@erratique.ch> In-Reply-To: <01ba01ce2736$e2973280$a7c59780$@ffconsultancy.com> References: <878v5lca2c.fsf@li195-236.members.linode.com> <9813208.KJBpLPkkvX@groupon> <069c01ce25ab$a9cf3f10$fd6dbd30$@ffconsultancy.com> <06b901ce25ca$cc415be0$64c413a0$@ffconsultancy.com> <514B81CB.3070103@etorok.net> <01a501ce2725$f3e530c0$dbaf9240$@ffconsultancy.com> <01ba01ce2736$e2973280$a7c59780$@ffconsultancy.com> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Haskell vs OCaml Le vendredi, 22 mars 2013 =C3=A0 20:53, Jon Harrop a =C3=A9crit : > In what sense? Since it was using OpenGL it wasn't "100% pure OCaml code". And apparently = your bindings to OpenGL were somehow broken. Unless as Edwin suggested you = maybe had stack overflows but that would also be a programming error on you= r part. One other track could be that the OpenGL drivers of your users were= buggy, which is really not uncommon.=20=20 To sum up, your comment made it seem like the thing to blame for your own f= ailures was OCaml itself, I doubt this is the right culprit in that case. Daniel