From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA05496; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:46:55 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA05495 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:46:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from will.iki.fi (will.iki.fi [217.169.64.20]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5JBIkEV003927 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:18:47 +0200 Received: from [10.129.39.133] (b212-54-26-185.elisa-laajakaista.fi [212.54.26.185]) by will.iki.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A24C5; Sat, 19 Jun 2004 14:18:46 +0300 (EEST) In-Reply-To: <20040619022648.7864665d.nicolas.francois@free.fr> References: <06D9583C-C0FD-11D8-8AC7-000393863F70@exomi.com> <20040619022648.7864665d.nicolas.francois@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <6D5202BA-C1E2-11D8-B4A4-000393863F70@exomi.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: caml-list@inria.fr From: Ville-Pertti Keinonen Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Great Programming Language Shootout Revived Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 14:18:44 +0300 To: Nicolas FRANCOIS (AKA El Bofo) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 40D42116.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 shootout:01 2004:99 ltu:99 mlton:01 scorecard:01 bug:01 totals:99 shootout:01 bias:01 ecrit:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 caml:01 nicolas:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Jun 19, 2004, at 3:26 AM, Nicolas FRANCOIS (AKA El Bofo) wrote: > Le Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:56:38 +0300 Ville-Pertti Keinonen=20 > > a =E9crit : >> I looked at it a bit earlier (when it was posted on LtU), and MLton=20= >> and >> SML/NJ were both ahead of OCaml in the overall scorecard for CPU. >> There was probably a bug in computing the totals, as the raw scores >> don't seem to have changed. > > They are ahead of the bytecode, not the native code. They were ahead of the native code, which was between C++ and SML/NJ. =20= I even clicked the link and scratched my head over the raw scores,=20 which seemed to indicate that it should've had a better overall score. > Again, it's not a promotion site for OCaml. So don't expect it to=20 > present > Caml better than any other language. Actually, since the original shootout author is a fan of OCaml, I=20 suspect the tests have something of a pro-OCaml bias. ;-) > So why don't you start your own site, or BETTER : contribute to the=20 > work > allready started ? Every time I start writing a comparison of programming languages, it=20 seems to require the length of a book... ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners