caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Remi Vanicat <remi.vanicat@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: async networking
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 21:51:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b8a91420602071251gcce7a3cx@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dsat9t$2k3$1@sea.gmane.org>

2006/2/7, Bardur Arantsson <spam@scientician.net>:
> Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
> > Yes, the default Equeue implementation bases simply on select(). It is,
> > however, possible to develop alternate implementations. Currently, there
> > are three of them which integrate into the event loops of labltk,
> > lablgtk1 and lablgtk2. One could, for example, easily add an
> > implementation for advanced kernel interfaces like epoll.
>
> Actually, it might be quite interesting to see one based on
> poll()/epoll(), but I suspect it wouldn't matter much compared to all
> the other stuff that's going in the Equeue code. This is just a very
> vague hunch, though.

I believe that labgtk (and so equeue over lablgtk) use poll. Note that
you are adding another layer : glib, so you might not have gain a lot.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-07 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-05  8:52 Rick Richardson
2006-02-05 17:32 ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
2006-02-06 18:34   ` Bardur Arantsson
2006-02-07  4:55     ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2006-02-07 17:44       ` Bardur Arantsson
2006-02-07 18:44         ` [Caml-list] " Rick Richardson
2006-02-07 19:01         ` Gerd Stolpmann
2006-02-07 19:43           ` Bardur Arantsson
2006-02-07 20:30             ` [Caml-list] " Gerd Stolpmann
2006-02-07 20:51             ` Remi Vanicat [this message]
2006-02-07 21:29         ` Rick Richardson
2006-02-07 22:03           ` Jonathan Roewen
2006-02-08  4:18             ` Rick Richardson
2006-02-08 14:43               ` Markus Mottl
2006-02-08  4:29           ` skaller
2006-02-05 20:18 ` [Caml-list] " Pierre Etchemaïté

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6b8a91420602071251gcce7a3cx@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=remi.vanicat@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).