From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9D1BB83 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:58:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k3JIw0vH028809 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:58:00 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA07570 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:58:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pproxy.gmail.com (pproxy.gmail.com [64.233.166.181]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k3JIvx2g021076 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:57:59 +0200 Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z74so1273875pyg for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:57:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kc+DRJG+Gw8YjadSlPGzH+eAVYzmhA/AxGWvfcf4QUgD/28mxTt/Jq4n8ws9LoIDeVuzYTJa0i0nClTx3MHC+mHEbQ86wFNzpTllJMiC54bWTmaRRU4qSr2Lg1Vehdes3oeRztxj13H8nkehz/fgi4cfazvnspDmI6tEYtJEV3k= Received: by 10.35.34.18 with SMTP id m18mr154794pyj; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.38.8 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6b8a91420604191157g4417b1aybbcf520c33d8ced0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:57:58 +0200 From: "Remi Vanicat" To: "Marc Lasson" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Bug in ocamlc or in ocamlrun. Cc: "Keiko Nakata" , caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <4446919B.9090405@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4445734B.6030004@free.fr> <20060419.174523.68533574.keiko@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <4446919B.9090405@free.fr> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 44468838.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 44468837.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; bug:01 ocamlc:01 ocamlrun:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 ocaml-:01 recursive:01 ocaml:01 2006:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 distrib:01 remi:01 remi:01 modules:01 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 2006/4/19, Marc Lasson : > Keiko Nakata wrote: > > >Strangely, OCaml version 3.08.0 can handle this code. > >So, the developer team must know the reason. > >Did you write a bug report ? > > > > > According to , > there was a change about recursive modules. They may have add a bug. > > > Did you write a bug report ? > > > Hum. Should I ? Yes, please do. The member of the ocaml teams don't read all message here, but they read all bug report > I am not expert at all, i have never written any bug report. Just give the example telling what happen > I don't know many things about ocaml sources. You don't need to to send bug report. Bug report only state problems, and the ocaml team will ask for further information if it's needed