From: "Pierre-Evariste Dagand" <pedagand@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: About Purity
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:53:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cb897b30801241253h7c7eb4b9y599eab1d0c0aeaf9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi list,
I'm looking for advices, especially from Computer Scientists using
OCaml as a language for their research works.
Here is my situation: I have worked on a system that relies on a
purely functional structure, let say a monad.
At the end, I have come up with a paper explaining how good and great
my work is ;-)
And finally, in order to get some feedback, my paper has been reviewed
by a Haskeller.
Here starts the issues :-)
Using OCaml in combination with a quite strange monad scared the
Haskeller. Indeed, as OCaml does not ensure referential transparency,
there is no formal proof that I'm pure and that what I have used is
truly a monad. And, no way, I did not succeed in convincing him that
my code is pure.
Nonetheless, I know that there are a lot of works in functional
programming that are carried out in OCaml.
So, my question is :
How do you convince these fanatics ;-) that you are pure ?
Obviously, I could show my code but it's about 2kloc that must be pure.
I am considering to re-write my system or at least the purely
functional subset in Haskell. But OCaml is like a mother tongue to me
so that's quite hard (sentimentally speaking) to leave it without
invoking the wisdom of its gurus.
Best regards,
--
Pierre-Evariste DAGAND
next reply other threads:[~2008-01-24 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-24 20:53 Pierre-Evariste Dagand [this message]
[not found] ` <47990F59.8000500@univ-savoie.fr>
2008-01-24 22:50 ` [Caml-list] " Pierre-Evariste Dagand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6cb897b30801241253h7c7eb4b9y599eab1d0c0aeaf9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pedagand@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).