From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3714BC0B for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:32:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.228]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0P2Wv4F016249 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:32:58 +0100 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i7so310980wra for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:32:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kwcZt5GXEK5qW+ZK97dzgIwKyMeIym7gklOx3t9YklEdBuQ8ItWtA7ifCqPVWBdBK6IvbyaZrkRscOXdqnt/6bIwJwRxroEMsDyrjBiW+I9I2YKApd68PdV2cxHd2jBVgnhBolzKU8P7v7fFtpHV7BGUk0JK3PKUbjVuM/94xeY= Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr1287754huf.1169692375696; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:32:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.100.6 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:32:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6dbd4d000701241832n40cfd1b8p40fa2300699e086d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:32:55 -0500 From: "Denis Bueno" To: "Ingo Bormuth" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Exception backtraces Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20070124215329.GA31041@efil.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6dbd4d000701221854v1fa172a9k59c0023e382fb2a7@mail.gmail.com> <20070124215329.GA31041@efil.de> X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 45B816D9.001 on discorde : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 0.000 -> 1 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 45B816D9.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; threads:01 camlp:01 native-code:01 stack:01 bytecode:01 ingo:98 efil:98 23,:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 exception:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 exceptions:01 caml:02 On 1/24/07, Ingo Bormuth wrote: > On 2007-01-22 21:54, Denis Bueno wrote: > > I found some > 6 year old threads on this list > > (http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2000/07/5a1aa1b9873679a2bf87fce5c55f342f.en.html) > > having to do with the fact that you couldn't get backtraces on caught > > exceptions without using camlp4. > > Is this still the case? > > Taken from the latest Caml Weekly News, for the week of January 16 to 23, 2007 : > > >> ======================================================================== > >> 8) native-code stack backtraces > >> Archive: >> cdd54b032895c17f/9af1209426f60400#9af1209426f60400> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> ** Xavier Leroy said: [snip long post] I did see that, but, since I'm compiling into bytecode (which, granted, I did not specify), I didn't think it applied to me. In any event, it doesn't specify how exactly to *get* backtraces (apart from OCAMLPARAM="b") at all. Is there a way? -Denis