From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kattlachan@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD0ABBCA
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:20:57 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqYBAKIU5UfRVZKwc2dsb2JhbACREgEMAwQFCRSRSIRJ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,539,1199660400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="24084791"
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2008 22:20:57 +0100
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2346919waf.3
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=BmYcHj7JtRyzdnybqmlrcpG76PTy0FZHzreXwWiTJQM=;
        b=NrMLRgZlCoEaR4QsNffcRvTDd1P2qamFdq10CsjS98LLokaaLwmEt+r9/jnNUEjWHmVmbo6cfaifx4O5FwGEsOcHxyymeOtLO4htQXqE0AfM656UsiExAbeXs5e7h71m9r/asEvO4CGgnLkM8iS3dyn+GtCUrXmWFn0aw5jd4Z8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=NPlT1F2j6zh9pdgYZH8tWjX3ik0JJNnSHp1WyjcjWlWhJGudWVOi6GqKfE9st2oeJ8oLVtHBZ65bQUsoVI7JaxqhX8xR9Uwm46Z8gcH9rv1iIbmGhu0F/kxDiIZkY2c4Uldltjr3PL9KvlCvQqghwMARjpDeWYrj7QsxYARQ8Tg=
Received: by 10.115.95.1 with SMTP id x1mr8624894wal.122.1206220856128;
        Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.60.12 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6ebe51ce0803221420h272bec70ne92695651f6b2b38@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:20:56 +0100
From: ketti <kattlachan@gmail.com>
To: "=?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?=" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] mutually recursive modules
Cc: "caml-list caml-list" <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <7B22B0CF-8E65-434A-9EF7-0C20EBE618E8@erratique.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <f74178430803221222n4d6360ecva5b3f0a1fd5a53c4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7B22B0CF-8E65-434A-9EF7-0C20EBE618E8@erratique.ch>
X-Spam: no; 0.00; recursive:01 recursive:01 functors:01 caml-list:01 modules:02 modules:02 mutually:06 mutually:06 wrap:08 possible:17 files:18 different:22 com:74 put:29 them:33 

>  > is it possible to put mutually recursive modules in different files?
>
>  No.

Yes.
If you wrap them in functors.