From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7CCBC37 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:10:25 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApEBAFhrn0pIDtyYkGdsb2JhbACSAYh8PwEBAQEJCQwHEwOtPYEnkCoBAwIEhBcF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,325,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="33668719" Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2009 16:10:24 +0200 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so715589fga.3 for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:10:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DJLWJ8O+FlKHGQSMogIQaEPbvQRojPnPqY9ucHNgKwc=; b=T22BqfrQg6B9xYFpyyx6QGRitxKOLxh7FeNGyOnr7WpjkO4oWFoafngBm+ypuotCR5 NWuiAs7QxDVxSyNrkhn+DL2xtfQ2Io9VDy54UtNSCC0eZHMEd5fvml7USUrjE4G3t07r IyuB04EkMqJK8grnF3FzI3u+ewsBH84nOmq+s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=lEbTXKd3YMMY/7kcMC8GWeeMlUAsUHEdXguFsz49O855j//UA8zJSTBPD6j3w/7NhJ 5pvOmLSn65WmEArLDbY1FAioiuT2WD+W9AXwQ9jFzsgtKQDV5JcXHPdmWcqecPP6GNj5 fxBK4oqAiRr+pER8I8v6+EF+EiuiPd2mFWD9w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.251.33 with SMTP id y33mr3925124fgh.62.1251987024302; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:10:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A9FBF04.1060608@gmail.com> References: <4A9FBF04.1060608@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:10:24 +0200 Message-ID: <6ebe51ce0909030710j65c3900cr31d7ca836fe7d46c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries? From: kattla To: Edgar Friendly Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 caml-list:01 executables:01 executables:01 caml:02 inria:06 batteries:91 batteries:91 adopt:13 issue:14 but:14 using:15 use:16 resolved:16 too:17 Hi, > 3) It makes my executables too big (Assuming this [0] is still true) For me this is the biggest reason for not using batteries. I don't really have a need for small executables right now, but I would like to at least know that this issue will be resolved before I adopt batteries. [0] http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2008/11/24509ad16aae6d1cc2e15f532e0007eb.en.html