caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Type_of?
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:41:30 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <712252.79789.qm@web54603.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (raw)

Hi,

I'm using the XHTML.M module from the Ocsigen project to generate valid
XHTML pages.  It makes heavy use of polymorphic variants, and as such the
types produced can be quite verbose and complex.  In practice, however, one
is rarely confronted with them (thank goodness for latent typing and type
inference!).  There is one exception, though: when unmarshalling, one must
explicitly provide the return type.  And this is the context for my question.

So, imagine I have a module with only two functions.  The first, "make_doc",
uses XHTML.M and its signature is therefore quite complex.  This is what
"ocamlc -i" tells me:

val make_doc: string ->
        [< `Address | `Blockquote | `Del | `Div | `Dl | `Fieldset | `Form | `H1
        | `H2 | `H3 | `H4 | `H5 | `H6 | `Hr | `Ins | `Noscript | `Ol | `P |
`PCDATA
        | `Pre | `Script | `Table | `Ul > `Blockquote `H1 `P ]
        XHTML.M.elt list


The second function, "unpickle_doc", uses the Marshal module to deserialise
from a string a previously pickled doc.  This is the definition of this
function:  (note that I've used copy & paste of the previous output of
"ocamlc -i" to provide the explicit type annotation)

let unpickle_doc str :
        [< `Address | `Blockquote | `Del | `Div | `Dl | `Fieldset | `Form | `H1
        | `H2 | `H3 | `H4 | `H5 | `H6 | `Hr | `Ins | `Noscript | `Ol | `P |
`PCDATA
        | `Pre | `Script | `Table | `Ul > `Blockquote `H1 `P ]
        XHTML.M.elt list
        = Marshal.from_string str 0


Now, this works fine.  It is however error prone, since if the signature
of make_doc changes somewhat and I forget to update the type annotation in
unpickle_doc, then I get a nasty runtime segfault.  So this is my question:
since the return type of make_doc is known at compile-time, is there any
way I can tell the compiler that the return type of unpickle_doc should be
the same as make_doc's?

Thank you for your help!
Dario Teixeira





      ___________________________________________________________
Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/


             reply	other threads:[~2008-01-05 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-05 16:41 Dario Teixeira [this message]
2008-01-05 17:12 ` [Caml-list] Type_of? Jeremy Yallop
2008-01-05 17:43 ` Arnaud Spiwack
2008-01-05 20:33 ` Type_of? Zheng Li
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-18  9:18 type of == Christophe DEHLINGER

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=712252.79789.qm@web54603.mail.re2.yahoo.com \
    --to=darioteixeira@yahoo.com \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).