From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA19BC6B for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 22:20:28 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAM5dNEfAXQInh2dsb2JhbACCPTaMDwIBCAop X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,397,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="4257350" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2007 22:20:28 +0100 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lA9LKPNh014759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 22:20:28 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAFZdNEdA6aLtmGdsb2JhbACCPTaMDwIBAQcCBhMY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,397,1188770400"; d="scan'208";a="4080737" Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.237]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2007 22:20:25 +0100 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id z3so516533nzf for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 13:20:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.102.5 with SMTP id z5mr917145wfb.1194643223471; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 13:20:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.164.7 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 13:20:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <71767b800711091320h5d14afb8qc614fb4f1951ed06@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:20:23 -0500 From: "Ralph Douglass" To: "Caml List" Subject: cost to let rec? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9400_10338518.1194643223452" X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4734CF19.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; rec:01 rec:01 compile:01 compile:01 defining:02 defining:02 slightly:03 slightly:03 let:03 let:03 function:08 function:08 i'm:09 i'm:09 curious:09 ------=_Part_9400_10338518.1194643223452 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Is there any cost to defining a function with "let rec" instead of just "let"? A slightly longer compile time or something? I'm just curious. -- Ralph ------=_Part_9400_10338518.1194643223452 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Is there any cost to defining a function with "let rec" instead of just "let"?  A slightly longer compile time or something?  I'm just curious.

--
Ralph ------=_Part_9400_10338518.1194643223452--