Can you post the list of dead links? Some people on the list might be able to provide updated information. On 2/15/08, Maxence Guesdon wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:48:24 +0100 > > Berke Durak wrote: > > > > It is not, but while we try to figure out what a reasonable system might > be, > > if you can set up a permanent repository for Ocaml code, that would > > be already quite useful! Most links on the Humps are dead. For > instance, > > I can't find a copy of Baire. > > > Sorry, buy I can't let you say that, because it's wrong. I made a quick > check (using wget) of the urls associated to each contributions of the > caml > humps. > > The result[1] is that 84.4% of the urls were found (487 on 577 contribs). > The remaining 15.6% (90 contribs) do not exist any more or did not respond > in time (-T 20 option for wget). So I wouldn't say that "most" links are > dead. > > The quality of the links of the hump depends on the information I can > gather > from announces on caml-list and mails to caml-hump@inria.fr. I don't crawl > the web all the day to find new or updated contributions. > > To improve this quality, the best is to send to caml-hump@inria.fr > information about new/updated/moved contributions, and other information > like licence, topic classification, etc. > > Thanks. > > Maxence, Caml Hump maintainer. > > [1] See the attached file for the links wget failed to retrieve. > Damned, there are even contribs of mine whose urls are deprecated ! I will > send me an email about those... > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > > > -- Ralph