On 2/15/08, Maxence Guesdon <maxence.guesdon@inria.fr> wrote:

Hello,

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:48:24 +0100

Berke Durak <berke.durak@exalead.com> wrote:

> It is not, but while we try to figure out what a reasonable system might be,
> if you can set up a permanent repository for Ocaml code, that would
> be already quite useful! Most links on the Humps are dead. For instance,
> I can't find a copy of Baire.

Sorry, buy I can't let you say that, because it's wrong. I made a quick
check (using wget) of the urls associated to each contributions of the caml
humps.

The result[1] is that 84.4% of the urls were found (487 on 577 contribs).
The remaining 15.6% (90 contribs) do not exist any more or did not respond
in time (-T 20 option for wget). So I wouldn't say that "most" links are
dead.

The quality of the links of the hump depends on the information I can gather
from announces on caml-list and mails to caml-hump@inria.fr. I don't crawl
the web all the day to find new or updated contributions.

To improve this quality, the best is to send to caml-hump@inria.fr
information about new/updated/moved contributions, and other information
like licence, topic classification, etc.

Thanks.

Maxence, Caml Hump maintainer.

[1] See the attached file for the links wget failed to retrieve.
Damned, there are even contribs of mine whose urls are deprecated ! I will
send me an email about those...

_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs