From: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Hongbo Zhang <bobzhang1988@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Syntax extensions without Camlp4
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 21:01:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71FFF6A2CF1E4E6DA0FFF397B2084B89@erratique.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC26FDD.9010407@gmail.com>
Le dimanche, 27 mai 2012 à 20:18, Hongbo Zhang a écrit :
> Come on, Parsetree.structure -> Parsetree.structure does not solve the scope rule problem.
I didn't say it did.
As I said in my message and in the comment of the blog post I'm not really fond of the proposal either but I still think it's a better thing than camlp4.
Regarding your comments about fragmentation, camlp4 is actually much more prone to lead to fragmentation and confusion (e.g. this revised syntax thing) than the proposed mechanism.
> I agree that it would be nice if we have metaocaml in.
Why not. But metaocaml is not about static meta-programming, it provides abstractions for runtime meta-programming.
Best,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-27 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-27 15:06 [Caml-list] " Alexandre Pilkiewicz
2012-05-27 16:53 ` [Caml-list] " Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-27 18:04 ` Daniel Bünzli
2012-05-27 18:18 ` Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-27 19:01 ` Daniel Bünzli [this message]
2012-05-27 22:43 ` Wojciech Meyer
2012-05-28 9:35 ` Daniel Bünzli
2012-05-28 9:59 ` Gabriel Scherer
2012-05-30 14:45 ` Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-28 11:17 ` Wojciech Meyer
2012-05-28 15:52 ` Jeffrey Scofield
2012-05-27 18:19 ` Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-28 8:17 ` Paolo Donadeo
2012-05-30 12:41 ` Alain Frisch
2012-05-30 13:18 ` Markus Mottl
2012-05-30 13:37 ` Dan Bensen
2012-05-30 14:16 ` Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-30 14:23 ` Paolo Donadeo
[not found] ` <20120531081913.GA26742@securactive.lan>
2012-05-31 12:26 ` Paolo Donadeo
2012-05-31 12:38 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2012-05-31 12:40 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2012-05-31 12:46 ` Yaron Minsky
2012-05-31 12:47 ` Gabriel Scherer
2012-05-31 22:08 ` Paolo Donadeo
2012-05-30 14:14 ` Hongbo Zhang
2012-05-31 12:59 ` Alain Frisch
2012-05-31 13:21 ` Dmitry Grebeniuk
2012-05-31 14:30 ` Daniel Bünzli
2012-05-31 16:01 ` bob zhang
2012-05-31 17:28 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2012-05-31 18:03 ` Wojciech Meyer
2012-05-31 18:32 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2012-05-31 18:32 ` Hongbo Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71FFF6A2CF1E4E6DA0FFF397B2084B89@erratique.ch \
--to=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
--cc=bobzhang1988@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).