From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB1947F9A9
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:34:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAEACR1sVNKN1ZKm2dsb2JhbABag1+CJ4EhwmwBgSMPAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiEAwEBBAEjVgULCxoCJgICRxAGG4gyCAQJqwScLxeBK40pMweCdzaBFgWhTReQOmsBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: AgAEACR1sVNKN1ZKm2dsb2JhbABag1+CJ4EhwmwBgSMPAQEBAQEGCwsJFCiEAwEBBAEjVgULCxoCJgICRxAGG4gyCAQJqwScLxeBK40pMweCdzaBFgWhTReQOmsBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,575,1400018400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="82955268"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2014 16:34:15 +0200
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (188.29.165.88.threembb.co.uk [188.29.165.88])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF33226F791;
	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:34:13 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:34:08 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <772547A75E58469BA90A1E03268D507B@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20140630141145.GC23123@frosties>
References: <94E1372FFFCE40BF87C5F09286E6C3FA@erratique.ch>
 <20140630082514.GA17024@frosties>
 <36D932F6570F44299DFA43CE015B51B9@erratique.ch>
 <20140630141145.GC23123@frosties>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Uucp 0.9.0

Le lundi, 30 juin 2014 =C3=A0 15:11, Goswin von Brederlow a =C3=A9crit :
> Package: ocaml-uucp
> Description: Unix to Unix Copy Program for OCaml (runtime)

Can=E2=80=99t  find it here:

https://packages.debian.org/stable/allpackages

> So what (Debian) package name should your Uucp then have?
According to the Debian OCaml packaging policy [1] it should be libuucp-oca=
ml.=20=20

> I'm just saying that it will cause confusion, at least among old
> timers like me.

Given that UUCP is no longer widespread, context should be largely sufficie=
nt to avoid confusion.

Best,

Daniel

[1] http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.html/c3=
05.html