From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4F0BC57 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:22:25 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,283,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="82080527" Received: from macadam.inria.fr ([128.93.8.130]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 01 Dec 2010 15:22:25 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] zero-arity constructor From: Damien Doligez In-Reply-To: <1221507223.79937.1290942833987.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:22:25 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7A41CF13-9C85-4696-8A99-45B8909DA631@inria.fr> References: <1290851344516@names.co.uk> <1221507223.79937.1290942833987.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr> To: OCaml mailing list X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Spam: no; 0.00; damien:01 damien:01 frisch:01 syntax:01 28,:98 plead:98 doligez:01 doligez:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 constructor:01 alain:01 guess:04 inria:06 frankly:10 On 2010-11-28, at 12:13, Alain Frisch wrote: > As I've been designated as the primary responsible for that uninspired = change (I plead guilty), I guess it is my responsibility to state here = that frankly, I don't give a damn. That said, enabling the warning by = default sounds better to me than reverting the change or introducing a = new syntax. I still like the change, because it gets rid of a special case. I'll = enable the warning by default. -- Damien