From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <damien.doligez@inria.fr>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35A3BBC1
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon,  3 Mar 2008 15:05:20 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAB+Uy0fAXQImh2dsb2JhbACQcgEBAQgKKYENmU8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,438,1199660400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="8895628"
Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2008 15:05:20 +0100
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m23E5J1d020967
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK)
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:05:20 +0100
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,438,1199660400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="7939488"
Received: from macabane.inria.fr ([128.93.8.160])
  by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 03 Mar 2008 15:05:20 +0100
Message-Id: <7B3055A3-E538-4C3D-84DD-89226797C91D@inria.fr>
From: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>
To: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20080303101553.GA11631@takhisis.invalid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml version 3.10.2 released
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:05:19 +0100
References: <625B7ADE-7ED6-4980-B7EF-B4072CC9992D@inria.fr> <20080303101553.GA11631@takhisis.invalid>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 47CC059F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; damien:01 damien:01 ocaml:01 zacchiroli:01 ocaml:01 doligez:01 doligez:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 binary:02 objects:02 generally:04 compiled:04 stefano:05 inria:06 


On 2008-03-03, at 11:15, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:

> I know generally this is not the case, but out of curiosity: is it
> possibly that by chance this release did *not* break the binary
> compatibility with objects compiled by OCaml 3.10.1?

I think it is compatible, but I cannot guarantee it.

-- Damien