From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.c.buenzli@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3459DBBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:12:01 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYCAPshyUnRVdykkGdsb2JhbACVKD8BAQEBCQkMBxEDrEyPdgEDAQODcwaFaA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,415,1233529200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="37146900"
Received: from mail-fx0-f164.google.com ([209.85.220.164])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2009 02:12:01 +0100
Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so3021809fxm.27
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:from:to
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
         :subject:date:references:x-mailer;
        bh=0b0+9VVttctnIXU+kfq+U2Xv5j+xEJvMEvBH5+tiYWU=;
        b=UeTZ+JbzdLpPT3EyJ657MLInF2fo/1gjEs91vzTu08bMs4XY5IrryIhgQ1lUq7DVYp
         ohe6+MvNPVYeWf642Qw90mnwDFuvdUFzG6Oc4GZxoxUNcCBdlYsN7hbMRxAWiCX42klL
         8Bvi3gdP/qRG6LRMCFrpdCoERIhbKlEt72dBg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references
         :x-mailer;
        b=ED8OF9gE6Wbu7kH2l8Mc8GAKsxZsRTi09MSlA4k7BZ0Bx8cTB30VYbapajeM4A0pmS
         VS5vvCFAIXBk62wJp2W9I6E3StUZbiyvNgwd7zPG8AxeNUp9s0ZPmOMjfE0QrbYPK+sj
         vJjbBIFkgIGOOmfNlxn5Y76h6SeBIXWKVTyzg=
Received: by 10.103.24.17 with SMTP id b17mr3914982muj.112.1237943520259;
        Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.1.34? (53-59.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.59.53])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10sm13194768muh.22.2009.03.24.18.11.59
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.c.buenzli@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <7C800296-BF33-429D-BEC5-D8B9E9EAFA79@erratique.ch>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: OCaml List <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20090325001703.GB14880@annexia.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] questions
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:11:02 +0100
References: <364f41440903241242v6dd2244fkbbd1ea8e3b20af60@mail.gmail.com> <20090325001703.GB14880@annexia.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Spam: no; 0.00; bunzli:01 buenzli:01 parser:01 pxp:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 caml:02 parse:02 hump:02 daniel:04 daniel:04 consensus:04 ecrit:06 inria:06 alternatives:08 


Le 25 mars 09 =E0 01:17, Richard Jones a =E9crit :

>> 3) Is there consensus on the best/fastest xml parser?
>
> There are certainly several to choose from :-)

If you intend to parse real (in the sense not under your own editing =20
control) xml documents the choice shrinks down drastically.

For pure caml solutions I'll suggest you either pxp or xmlm but I'm =20
biaised.

In any case you'll find a list of alternatives here [1]

Best,

Daniel

[1] http://caml.inria.fr/cgi-bin/hump.fr.cgi?sort=3D0&browse=3D49=