From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E7EBBAF for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:17:26 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhUCAB6ze0vRVdzSkGdsb2JhbACDBZAxh0QIFQEBAQEJCQwHEwMgriKPc4EwglFcBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,492,1262559600"; d="scan'208";a="52928706" Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com ([209.85.220.210]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2010 18:17:26 +0100 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so1487671fxm.7 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:17:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.87.51.9 with SMTP id d9mr14830109fgk.35.1266426574080; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:09:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201002161808.21283.jon@ffconsultancy.com> References: <756daca51002160847k1a416f01p36cc192d00e25697@mail.gmail.com> <201002161808.21283.jon@ffconsultancy.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:09:34 +0100 Message-ID: <7d8707de1002170909w34ec675fse28c4951d6b52e13@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: WAS Re: [Caml-list] Re: The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion From: Andrej Bauer To: Jon Harrop Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam: no; 0.00; recursive:01 defintion:01 andrej:01 andrej:01 rec:01 caml-list:01 specify:06 function:08 bauer:09 bauer:09 think:13 moreover:13 burden:14 but:14 such:14 >Moreover, the burden of "rec" is tiny so I don't think it is worth >discussing in such detail. Ah, but you are forgetting Wadler's Law.