From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BA567F720 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 14:33:26 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmcEAFaDSlNKN1ZKlGdsb2JhbABZhgeBIcAdgS8OAQEBAQcLCwkSKoIlAQEBAwEjVgULCxoCJgICRxAGG4dsCASoDqIZF4EpjRIzB4JvNYEUAQOfHhePIg X-IPAS-Result: AmcEAFaDSlNKN1ZKlGdsb2JhbABZhgeBIcAdgS8OAQEBAQcLCwkSKoIlAQEBAwEjVgULCxoCJgICRxAGG4dsCASoDqIZF4EpjRIzB4JvNYEUAQOfHhePIg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,851,1389740400"; d="scan'208";a="56904654" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Apr 2014 14:33:25 +0200 Received: from [172.20.10.2] (210-236.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.236.210]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5545E26EFEAC; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 12:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 14:33:18 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: Adrien Nader Cc: Anil Madhavapeddy , "=?utf-8?Q?caml-list=40inria.fr?=" Message-ID: <813A232579A8419EAD19E55DE97C2655@erratique.ch> In-Reply-To: <20140413111751.GA15558@notk.org> References: <9636C678CAA541CCB505CE8771722A68@erratique.ch> <063FC564F6B44EA5AB1CF1D5589996D0@erratique.ch> <20140412073949.GA31995@notk.org> <20140412074401.GA803@notk.org> <20140412114145.GA18285@notk.org> <74C2E1F54AA349E6899E909804979B72@erratique.ch> <20140413092144.GA1838@notk.org> <06FC9D12-A9BB-41C7-8C3E-EADBA1157F89@recoil.org> <20140413111751.GA15558@notk.org> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml script on windows (was Re: [ANN] React 1.0.0) Le dimanche, 13 avril 2014 =C3=A0 13:17, Adrien Nader a =C3=A9crit : > As for additional hooks, I have too many bad examples to count them. > Starting with curl's and c-ares' way to find the prototype to select() > and friends: they test the combination of all possible argument types > (yes, all the 1440 ones; and there's an invocation of cc for each one). Pure beauty. > I really don't think it's the tools which are to be criticized nowadays; > it's the people. Well if most people get it wrong, I'd rather suggest that the tools are. Bl= aming people rarely solves problems. Thanks for the hints about windows,=20=20 Daniel