caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rixed@happyleptic.org
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Only bytecode version of executable allocating huge amounts
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 18:49:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8610b652-83c8-464d-b57c-c6c9b9baec41@www.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d058e9d-5293-46f1-9941-7c33fd232e04@www.fastmail.com>

Can it be another instance of https://github.com/ocaml/opam/issues/3636 ?

On Tue, May 28, 2019, at 14:27, Jon French wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm wondering if anyone on this list might have encountered this issue 
> before, since it's got me pretty stumped.
> 
> We have an OCaml project ( https://github.com/rems-project/sail ) which 
> tries to allocate huge amounts of memory, but only when compiled to 
> bytecode. The native version works perfectly fine.
> 
> strace for an example run ends in:
> 
> > openat(AT_FDCWD, "/home/ojno/work/sail2/lib/vector_dec.sail", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
> > lseek(3, 0, SEEK_CUR) = 0
> > read(3, "$ifndef _VECTOR_DEC\n$define _VEC"..., 65536) = 7031
> > mmap(NULL, 1965819695104, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory)
> > brk(0x5729f32c4000) = 0x55603f2f4000
> > mmap(NULL, 1965819826176, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory)
> > write(2, "Fatal error: out of memory.\n", 28Fatal error: out of memory.
> > ) = 28
> > exit_group(2) = ?
> > +++ exited with 2 +++
> 
> which naturally fails since I don't have 2 TB of memory available. 
> 
> The exact amount of the allocation varies from input to input and even 
> run to run, but is always that approximate size. There's no 
> characteristic pattern of heap or stack running out of control if I 
> turn on memory debugging info in $OCAMLRUNPARAM, just that one huge 
> allocation. When run in ocamldebug, it also doesn't appear to be 
> failing at a location which is sensible to be allocating such amounts 
> of memory -- and the location also varies with the input. And on tiny 
> inputs it doesn't seem to try and make the allocation at all.
> 
> Are we actually seeing a compiler/runtime bug here? Is there something 
> I'm missing?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jon French
> Computer Laboratory
> University of Cambridge

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-28 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-28 11:32 Jon French
2019-05-28 16:49 ` rixed [this message]
2019-05-28 17:16 ` Xavier Leroy
2019-05-28 17:23 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2019-05-28 17:58   ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2019-05-29 15:22     ` Jon French

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8610b652-83c8-464d-b57c-c6c9b9baec41@www.fastmail.com \
    --to=rixed@happyleptic.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).