From: michaelgrunewald@yahoo.fr (Michaël Grünewald)
To: "Bünzli Daniel" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
Cc: Andrej.Bauer@andrej.com, caml-list List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Exceptionless error management
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:27:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <861w7xb0gi.fsf@Llea.celt.neu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B5C1FEA6-3C5C-4E58-8A1E-08E599BAAB93@erratique.ch> (=?iso-8859-15?Q?=22B=FCnzli?= Daniel"'s message of "Thu\, 31 Jan 2008 21\:03\:58 +0100")
Bünzli Daniel <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch> writes:
>> time jot 1000000 | ./in.native
>
> real 0m4.814s
> user 0m4.371s
> sys 0m0.218s
You are timing `jot' aren't you?
>> time jot 1000000 | ./inb.native
>
> real 0m4.790s
> user 0m4.355s
> sys 0m0.217s
The recommendation you proposed would be even more useful if it
emphasizes when ``Exceptionless error management'' is adequate. You
can rewrite last sentence of first paragraph
``The following points suggest that raising exceptions to signal
unexceptional error cases is not a good idea.''
like this:
``Let's enumerate situations where raising exceptions to signal
unexceptional error cases is not a good idea.''
Maybe would you also suppress the `bad' in the first sentence, since
it is `bad' with regard to the situations you are enumerating.
--
Michaël
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-01 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-31 8:55 Bünzli Daniel
2008-01-31 9:57 ` [Caml-list] " Till Varoquaux
2008-01-31 11:01 ` Bünzli Daniel
2008-01-31 14:09 ` Andrej Bauer
2008-01-31 14:16 ` Michael Ekstrand
2008-01-31 19:28 ` David Teller
2008-01-31 19:59 ` Michael Ekstrand
2008-01-31 20:05 ` blue storm
2008-01-31 20:03 ` Bünzli Daniel
2008-01-31 20:25 ` David Teller
2008-01-31 20:40 ` David Teller
2008-01-31 21:16 ` Bünzli Daniel
2008-01-31 21:31 ` David Teller
2008-01-31 21:35 ` Jon Harrop
2008-01-31 22:01 ` Christophe Raffalli
2008-02-01 7:27 ` Michaël Grünewald [this message]
2008-02-01 7:47 ` Bünzli Daniel
2008-02-01 10:50 ` Till Varoquaux
2008-02-01 11:31 ` Bünzli Daniel
2008-02-01 15:59 ` Vincent Hanquez
2008-02-01 18:37 ` Bünzli Daniel
2008-02-01 19:43 ` Vincent Hanquez
2008-02-01 16:04 ` David Allsopp
2008-02-01 8:31 ` David Teller
2008-02-01 12:19 ` Yaron Minsky
2008-02-05 10:00 ` David Teller
2008-02-05 10:12 ` Vincent Hanquez
2008-02-05 10:26 ` Bünzli Daniel
2008-02-05 11:06 ` Vincent Hanquez
2008-02-05 13:46 ` Jon Harrop
2008-02-05 11:36 ` Frédéric van der Plancke
2008-02-06 8:45 ` Michaël Grünewald
2008-02-08 13:09 ` Bünzli Daniel
2008-02-05 14:12 ` David Teller
2008-02-11 8:12 ` David Teller
2008-02-11 9:09 ` Bünzli Daniel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=861w7xb0gi.fsf@Llea.celt.neu \
--to=michaelgrunewald@yahoo.fr \
--cc=Andrej.Bauer@andrej.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).