From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA04161; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:51:10 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA04155 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:51:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from mwinf0103.wanadoo.fr (smtp1.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i0ILp8P00427 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:51:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from debian (ca-bordeaux-32-193.w80-8.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.8.202.193]) by mwinf0103.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B042C1BFFFD1 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:51:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from moi by debian with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AiKpY-0004xM-00 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:51:40 +0100 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: SPAM again?! [xdfsnwu@lycos.com: [Caml-list] bongo ipso eurasia] References: <20040118105639.GA517@first.in-berlin.de> From: Remi Vanicat Mail-Copy-To: never Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:51:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040118105639.GA517@first.in-berlin.de> (Oliver Bandel's message of "Sun, 18 Jan 2004 11:56:39 +0100") Message-ID: <871xpxc4cz.dlv@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 oliver:01 in-berlin:01 oliver:01 bandel:01 caml-list:01 ocaml:01 writes:01 remi:01 remi:01 vanicat:01 vanicat:01 maybe:06 problem:07 lycos:92 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk oliver@first.in-berlin.de (Oliver Bandel) writes: > Hi, > > this SPAM was NOT blocked. > > Maybe the filter of the Caml-list has a problem? Well, one of them pass my filter too, these are cleverly done SPAM to pass through spam filter. > If this goes throigh the filter, the spammers may use that > hole in the filter, and in some weeks we may again have to > delete 60 mails per day by hand? Well, ocaml could filter machine listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com And the spam filter might be improved, or might learn (I don't know what kind of filter the caml-list use.) [...] -- Rémi Vanicat ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners