From: Nuutti Kotivuori <naked+caml@naked.iki.fi>
To: Brian Hurt <bhurt@spnz.org>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Object-oriented access bottleneck
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:17:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871xrfd358.fsf@naked.iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312071318110.5009-100000@localhost.localdomain> (Brian Hurt's message of "Sun, 7 Dec 2003 13:30:45 -0600 (CST)")
Brian Hurt wrote:
> I actually question the value of inlining as a performance
> improvement, unless it leads to other signifigant optimizations.
I'm sorry but I do not wish to discuss the relative merits or unmerits
of inlining.
But I'm sure you must agree that there are indeed atleast specific
cases where inlining does help. It would be nice if the language would
be flexible enough to allow the compiler the choice to inline, in
cases where it will result in better performance.
-- Naked
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-08 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-07 2:39 Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-07 2:59 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-12-07 11:22 ` Benjamin Geer
2003-12-07 14:12 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-12-07 18:04 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-07 10:27 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-12-07 19:46 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 1:07 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-12-08 15:08 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 15:42 ` Richard Jones
2003-12-09 0:26 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-12-09 12:10 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-09 13:17 ` Olivier Andrieu
2003-12-09 13:53 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 17:51 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 18:19 ` brogoff
2003-12-08 20:09 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 19:02 ` Xavier Leroy
2003-12-08 21:37 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 21:06 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 22:30 ` malc
2003-12-07 18:23 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-07 18:14 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-07 19:30 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-07 23:50 ` Abdulaziz Ghuloum
2003-12-08 17:29 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 18:48 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 10:17 ` Nuutti Kotivuori [this message]
2003-12-08 19:51 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871xrfd358.fsf@naked.iki.fi \
--to=naked+caml@naked.iki.fi \
--cc=bhurt@spnz.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).