From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id GAA02862; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:47:40 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id GAA02887 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:47:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA17970 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 06:20:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g8M4KnD07734 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 06:20:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17syEg-00058m-00 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 06:20:46 +0200 To: caml-list@inria.fr X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17syEg-00058d-00 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 06:20:46 +0200 Path: not-for-mail From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?=" Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Wasn't O'Caml a functional language? Date: 22 Sep 2002 06:23:08 +0200 Organization: (none) Message-ID: <871y7m1wlv.fsf@ketanu.dyndns.org> References: <3D8CF6F8.2050904@baretta.com> <15756.65084.40025.869484@spike.artisan.com> <3D8D050F.9000108@baretta.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: amontpellier-203-1-1-52.abo.wanadoo.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032668446 19754 80.13.70.52 (22 Sep 2002 04:20:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 04:20:46 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Alessandro Baretta writes: [...] > Anyway, my main claim, although misdirected, in not entirely > faulty. Queue.transfer can be thought of as analogous to > List.append. When I write let list = list1 @ list2 I do not expect > side-effects on list1 or list2. Then you maybe should use Lists, why, if queues have the same behavior than lists, give them a different name ? -- Michaël Grünewald - RSA PGP Key ID: 0x20D90C12 ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners