From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lambda.q.q@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0181F7EC41
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:52:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  lambda.q.q@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.217.182;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="lambda.q.q@gmail.com";
  x-sender="lambda.q.q@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  lambda.q.q@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.182 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.217.182;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="lambda.q.q@gmail.com";
  x-sender="lambda.q.q@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-lb0-f182.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.217.182;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="lambda.q.q@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-lb0-f182.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmUBACeghlDRVdm2mGdsb2JhbABEhU23ZIQsCCMBAQEBAQgJDQcUJ4IeAQEBAwESAiYGATgBAwELAQUFISUPAQQNEwEFASITIodQAwkGBJ1QCQOOFIEKhSonDYlOAQUMimxsIoY3A4hUi0iBVYspgy8/gViCPoFX
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,635,1344204000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="160093112"
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com ([209.85.217.182])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 23 Oct 2012 15:52:18 +0200
Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id b5so665924lbd.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id
         :user-agent:mime-version:content-type;
        bh=46qsSG+Er+YyxVRInOI6nkJfaVpbhWS26aJm0Ca1st8=;
        b=KkAj/I6SGThVE+mnk8JARPItx1v5Xye01b/GmfSU/G72C6ds10WCKroqCwQMZ++uAD
         gjjGMv3FBY4pqAlVB6OV5MOFm2Vq9UcWAXEAA0ESdZcC3qx0LAqrm229LgTEikewt/vm
         yIgGBsP7yvGqLAi7FADyzjuOG1aM00AGobsW/cCX3TDklRj7uDAJpwRqvKO5Fu+Vr0qp
         wrLs6DyQ1R87/vwAjvZm/bHPkHRw1mKC8sWGd7Xlyetwli4n6gP9yNca0v5fJIM0VCMI
         KVKApTykUEZ5cJ6Ks6Moz6S623I1U8egiFhhnR+3uNcVtqpjUUUlBnN5qHYTWw/q2qkP
         g8VA==
Received: by 10.152.110.74 with SMTP id hy10mr11558651lab.54.1351000337418;
        Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from golf.niidar.ru.niidar.ru ([178.176.69.217])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id so7sm4021872lab.0.2012.10.23.06.52.15
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Ivan Gotovchits <lambda.q.q@gmail.com>
From: Ivan Gotovchits <ivg@ieee.org>
To: Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
References: <877gqhnzq1.fsf@golf.niidar.ru>
	<CAPFanBG3nrmmfYG4i-QegYcaorHkJX=+3+YEQV4mqJF8GZQf1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:57:15 +0400
In-Reply-To: <CAPFanBG3nrmmfYG4i-QegYcaorHkJX=+3+YEQV4mqJF8GZQf1w@mail.gmail.com>
	(Gabriel Scherer's message of "Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:30:41 +0200")
Message-ID: <873915nves.fsf@golf.niidar.ru>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [Batteries or Camlp4] Functionaly updating several
 fields in an object

Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com> writes:

> It appears to be a parsing bug in the 3.11 version of Camlp4. It
> happens neither with 3.10.2 or with more recent version.
> (I was lucky to find a machine with 3.11.2 installed; it's good to
> have rarely-updated servers around)
>
> Steps to reproduce:
>   camlp4o -str 'let _ = {< a = a; b = b >}'
> Observed result:
>   {< a = (a; b = b); >}
>
> Upgrading to a more recent version of OCaml would solve your problem.
> Otherwise, not using syntax extensions is also fine.
>

Unfortunately, I cannot upgrade to a more recent version. Because I'm
restricted to use a certified software...

Though, many thanks for clarifying the issue!

-- 
         (__) 
         (oo) 
   /------\/ 
  / |    ||   
 *  /\---/\ 
    ~~   ~~   
...."Have you mooed today?"...