From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851CBBBCA for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:54:03 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAACPFw0fAXQInh2dsb2JhbACQYwEBAQgKKZwl X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,408,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="8612227" Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2008 16:54:03 +0100 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m1QFrsZN002755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:54:03 +0100 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,408,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="9615169" Received: from 250-112.msr-inria.inria.fr ([193.55.250.112]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 26 Feb 2008 16:54:03 +0100 Message-Id: <873F2280-CF0A-4216-BBBA-CFAB978C49CA@inria.fr> From: Damien Doligez To: caml users In-Reply-To: <20080225124840.GA18630@annexia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ANNOUNCE: OCaml in Fedora & Red Hat Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:54:02 +0100 References: <20080225124840.GA18630@annexia.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 47C43612.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; damien:01 damien:01 ocaml:01 mingw:01 48,:98 doligez:01 doligez:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 perhaps:05 inria:06 red:92 uses:07 release:09 i'm:09 On 2008-02-25, at 13:48, Richard Jones wrote: > [1] Perhaps 3.10.2 if released in time and there are no major > incompatibilities with libraries. I'm still waiting for someone to try the release candidate under Vista, and for someone (else) to try it with MinGW. Or should I conclude that Vista is so bad that nobody uses it? -- Damien