From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: unification of alternatives
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:19:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <873bhmabxo.fsf-monnier+gmane.comp.lang.caml.inria@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1142239620.8419.314.camel@budgie.wigram>
> I have an interesting problem with unification algorithm.
> The problem is basically that given two terms,
> either that unify, they don't unify, or *NEW* they don't
> unify yet but might later.
I believe you're looking for something called "residualization" in
constraint and logic programming: if the unification algorithm can return
not just a substitution but also some residual constraints that it wasn't
able to resolve (but which may be resolvable later).
Stefan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-13 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 8:47 skaller
2006-03-13 10:19 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=873bhmabxo.fsf-monnier+gmane.comp.lang.caml.inria@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).