From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92951BB84 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:08:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6C48GfE017661 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:08:16 +0200 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA24199 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:08:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6C48FYP013496 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:08:15 +0200 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b29so86847pya for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:08:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=N/A5uMzhwuLvm0y+iXEg8czcIPOPFkpq4j8s0ugsAgRbDTKK+EYKQQMLpnDdFdmJAVIZvp5aXxGbWHaQ+rNv4aIuuiFgmW1GbE/hJN4/jNFirmaDIi06DEduQexcw02pwsZaWo4xUWqccoyAOuGRkj1HptovilaZsrX8CKJ4QJk= Received: by 10.35.90.20 with SMTP id s20mr352953pyl; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.20.11 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 21:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <875c7e070607112108l7a373ebesff2891f9b1c5eeb7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:08:14 -0400 From: "Chris King" To: "Jacques Garrigue" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Performance of immediate objects Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20060712.095124.108739217.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <875c7e070607110710k2ca8d548i7f9d8e22d801df8e@mail.gmail.com> <20060712.095124.108739217.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 44B475AF.000 on nez-perce : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 44B475B0.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 44B475AF.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; foo:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 jacques:01 output:02 objects:02 garrigue:03 garrigue:03 nagoya-u:04 chris:05 chris:05 function:08 object:09 sense:09 but:13 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On 7/11/06, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > Initialization occurs only once, but one needs to check whether it was > done every time an object is created. Thanks, now the assembly output makes more sense to me. I saw the initialization code in the mk_foo function but didn't realize that it was executed only once. - Chris King