From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from discorde.inria.fr (discorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.38]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02349BB83 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:47:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8DGlRk4008821 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:47:27 +0200 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id y38so1966759nfb for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:47:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UoyqzOdXJhEMpGe3cPU6YyrD4bXxu/DTYErVVkEHd4IqBim713afpPZdt3khh5loSDQyIQe1qnDSQbxYLy0L3Azxxb504RE1giDYYUflON7JkmOgdX8mFxvlmWI+LHqALOx6lwUSnvOr2wcIE0u7bauwtjyjzK88MMrPFLeXTSk= Received: by 10.48.254.1 with SMTP id b1mr11120117nfi; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.7.17 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <875c7e070609130947j635a2ef2n9406b7c0f252f71c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:47:26 -0400 From: "Chris King" To: "Nicolas Pouillard" Subject: Re: 3.09.3 release candidate 2 Cc: "Hendrik Tews" , "caml users" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <0A29CC70-FA05-432A-9DF5-8B98F6E573F3@inria.fr> <4E2C1762-63F0-4540-8639-056C1C86528A@inria.fr> <1158161553.6133.236.camel@rosella.wigram> X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 4508361F.001 on discorde : j-chkmail score : X : 0/20 1 X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 4508361F.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; hendrik:01 tews:01 tews:01 plexer:01 cmx:01 cmo:01 cmi:01 cmx:01 compiler:01 cmxa:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 inline:01 tend:02 consistent:02 On 9/13/06, Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > On 9/13/06, Hendrik Tews wrote: > > > > But with this line of reasoning, plexer.{o,cmx} should not be > > installed either, shouln't it? > > So in order to be consistent either one do not expose at all the > content of a library or one install all components (.cmo, .cmi, .cmx, > .o). I tend to prefer the first one. I remember hearing somewhere that by exposing .cmx files, the compiler is able to inline across module boundaries, and thus distributing .cmx files is desirable. Is this just a myth? It seems redundant since the .cmx files are included in the .cmxa anyway. - Chris King