caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Gotovchits <ivg@ieee.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Higher order functors over tuples
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:26:51 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87625rhu04.fsf@golf.niidar.ru> (raw)


Good day,

1. A problem in general 

In general, the problem is to compute a tuple of objects that have
types different, but conforming to the same interface, i.e., given a
group of modules (A,B,C), conforming to signature S to construct some 

   module M: functor(A:S) -> functor(B:S) -> functor(C:S) -> S

that will, in a some way, «map/reduce» computation on corresponding
modules.

The problem can be generalized further, but, it seems to me, that it is
already quite (too?) abstract.

As far as I can see, there is no ad hoc solution for this problem in
OCaml, except, of course, objects with their late binding. But, in some
circumstances, the late binding can be avoided. In particular, when
types of modules and their amount are known and fixed at compile time.


2. Particular problem 

For example, we have several different data generator modules conforming
to the signature 

   module type Generator = 
   sig
     type t
     type r
     val create: unit  -> t 
     val result: t -> r option  
     val step:   t -> t option 
   end

Each generator can be stepped forward and queried for a result. Generator
can expire, in such case it will return None as a result. I want to make a
«list» of different generators and do some arbitary iterations on them. 

The «list» can be made of pairs, using the cons (meta)constructor:

   module Cons :
     functor(G1:Generator) -> functor(G2:Generator) -> Generator

So, if I have three modules A,B,C, I can construct module

   M = Cons(A)(Cons(B)(C))

and call M.step, to move a chain of generators forward, or M.result to
get the current result.


3. Particular solution

Here is the implementation on Cons module (named ConsGenerator), that "steps"
contained generators in a sequence (swapping them on each step).

   module ConsGenerator
       (G1:Generator)
       (G2:Generator with type r = G1.r)
       : Generator with type r = G2.r = 
   struct
     type t =
       | G1G2 of (G1.t option * G2.t option )
       | G2G1 of (G2.t option * G1.t option )

     type r = G2.r

     let create () =
       G1G2 ((Some (G1.create ())), Some (G2.create ()))

     let step = function
       | G1G2 (g1, Some g2)   -> Some (G2G1 (G2.step g2, g1))
       | G2G1 (g2, Some g1)   -> Some (G1G2 (G1.step g1, g2))
       | G2G1 (Some g2, None) -> Some (G2G1 (G2.step g2, None))
       | G1G2 (Some g1, None) -> Some (G1G2 (G1.step g1, None))
       | G1G2 (None,None) | G2G1 (None,None) -> None

     let result = function
       | G1G2 (Some g1,_) -> G1.result g1
       | G2G1 (Some g2,_) -> G2.result g2
       | G1G2 (None,_) | G2G1 (None,_) -> None
   end

Function `proceed' iterates module M and print results

   let rec proceed oe = match M.step oe with 
     | Some oe -> begin 
       match M.result oe with
         | Some r -> print_int r; proceed oe
         | None   -> proceed oe
     end
     | None -> print_newline (); 
         print_endline "generator finished"      

Just for a completness of the example a pair of simple generators:

   module Odd : Generator with type r = int = struct
     type t = int
     type r = int
     let create () = -1
     let step v = if v < 10 then Some (v+2) else None
     let result v = if v <= 9 then Some v else None
   end

   module Even : Generator with type r = int = struct
     type t = int
     type r = int
     let create () = 0
     let step v = if v < 10 then Some (v+2) else None
     let result v = if v <= 8 then Some v else None
   end

and the result was
   # module M = Cons(Even)(Cons(Cons(Odd)(Even))(Even))
   # let _  = proceed (M.create ())
   22244618648365879
   generator finished
   - : unit = ()


4. Question

And now the questions!

1) Is there any idiomatic solution to this pattern?

2) If not, can my solution be improved in some way? And how?

3) My intution says that it can be solved with monads (Generator really
incapsulates side effects in a step. Several computation are combined in
one big chain... ). Am I right? If so, how to implement it in monads?

Thanks for reading down to this line =) Any comments are welcome!

P.S. Sorry for such a long article. I haven't enough brains to make it
shorter =)

-- 
         (__) 
         (oo) 
   /------\/ 
  / |    ||   
 *  /\---/\ 
    ~~   ~~   
...."Have you mooed today?"...

             reply	other threads:[~2012-10-31  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-31  9:26 Ivan Gotovchits [this message]
2012-10-31 11:09 ` Didier Cassirame
2012-10-31 12:02   ` Ivan Gotovchits
2012-11-30 12:49   ` [Caml-list] ocamlc, ocamlopt stackoverflow on list Christophe Raffalli
2012-11-30 13:20     ` Gabriel Scherer
2012-11-30 13:31       ` Christophe Raffalli
2012-11-30 14:15         ` Gabriel Scherer
2012-11-06 11:48 [Caml-list] Higher order functors over tuples oleg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87625rhu04.fsf@golf.niidar.ru \
    --to=ivg@ieee.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).