From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337D0BC8E for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 04:05:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1N35EbB027202 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 04:05:14 +0100 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so573387rne for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:05:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=AbV0yfUfoOIy2CHgV6jno0KeJO8qm2/Zb0gv1nvf9CWXlHnsqaTnfbg5Pc8D3ZuZqJsLeAhsEYEGvIcfLPkj9e/EX0d85NlMFBXYvaKeDgkMByptMib4XfJBMSzKqjzdD5takOAu6c2aBpOrmzu0FWYYcl7M2wPCsWkWGriFrWQ= Received: by 10.38.151.1 with SMTP id y1mr20908rnd; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:05:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.86.80 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:05:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <877e9a170502221905376d1d93@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:05:11 -0500 From: Michael Walter Reply-To: Michael Walter To: Jon Harrop Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Cross-platform "Hello, World" graphical application in OCaml Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <200502230005.01479.jon@jdh30.plus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050222120308.GA2975@furbychan.cocan.org> <200502222216.25721.jon@jdh30.plus.com> <4a4478d088d9fa3d5d1d82dd42b163d8@epfl.ch> <200502230005.01479.jon@jdh30.plus.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 421BF2EA.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocaml:01 wrote:01 flatten:01 lacks:01 ocaml:01 ...:98 functions:01 hierarchical:02 graphical:02 ides:03 programming:03 module:03 tentative:04 nested:04 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:05:01 +0000, Jon Harrop wrote: > The editors I've seen under Linux are making tentative steps in the right > direction but they are still miles away from what could be achieved. > OCamlbrowser displays hierarchical lists of module contents graphically. > KEdit lets you flatten C++ function definitions, but C++ lacks nested > functions. Particularly in OCaml, programming could be so much easier with > more sophisticated editors... I pay for good IDEs :-) Michael