From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pierre.weis@inria.fr>
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24C5BC32
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Tue,  8 Mar 2005 15:17:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j28EHUrD029344
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:17:30 +0100
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA04687 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:17:30 +0100 (MET)
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j28EHTRn001627
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:17:29 +0100
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so2485039rne
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 06:17:29 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=ERbMXeJrgR3bNzKsrCqvT3nuHGTz1WX6XIyVTjMjojEqU5e3MG7xrJit4RTDNsVcuVa2GkrsySo3m8vqiASsMp5ZwU8ubnq5o9AV1f750o5s5tblSZWBLaYj4p0vL85+9YgYBOtDsg3Pn+5Jxa4ARjSLBdLUQdZ+7ehbjWLmqbU=
Received: by 10.38.59.52 with SMTP id h52mr172013rna;
        Tue, 08 Mar 2005 06:17:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.86.60 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 06:17:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <877e9a170503080617618753e9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:17:28 -0500
From: Michael Walter <michael.walter@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Michael Walter <michael.walter@gmail.com>
To: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: exception safety / RAII ?
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
In-Reply-To: <20050308123210.GA4997@furbychan.cocan.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <293072a520e3724a0497e6456a8675be@mac.com>
	 <200503071330.49084.jon@jdh30.plus.com>
	 <877e9a170503070721b2e0298@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200503071729.20117.jon@jdh30.plus.com>
	 <877e9a1705030710476502ad31@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1110281592.680.102.camel@localhost>
	 <20050308123210.GA4997@furbychan.cocan.org>
X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 422DB3FA.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 422DB3F9.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 finalizers:01 boehm:01 iirc:01 ...:98 ...:98 wrote:01 exception:01 finalisation:04 tue:06 michael:07 michael:07 destructors:07 hans:09 might:10 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=disabled 
	version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:32:11 +0000, Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org> wrote:
> [...]
> 
> There was a great paper I read about a year ago all about how
> finalisation and destruction are completely separate concepts.
> Unfortunately I can't find it now ...

Might it be "Destructors, Finalizers, and Synchronization" by Hans
Boehm? IIRC that was really a nice paper.

Michael