From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF4617EE80 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:49:06 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of mmatalka@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.210.44; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of mmatalka@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.44 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.210.44; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-da0-f44.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.210.44; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-da0-f44.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtYCAMzhRlHRVdIsiGdsb2JhbABDhDmDJr1HgVkWDgEBAQoJFBQEJIIkAQEEAScZARsdAQMBCwYFGAklDwEEDQIRAQUBNYgBAQMJBgGjWIwygnuEFgoZJw1ZiHwBBQyMQIJJBxaDKgOUfo1Igzg/hEk X-IPAS-Result: AtYCAMzhRlHRVdIsiGdsb2JhbABDhDmDJr1HgVkWDgEBAQoJFBQEJIIkAQEEAScZARsdAQMBCwYFGAklDwEEDQIRAQUBNYgBAQMJBgGjWIwygnuEFgoZJw1ZiHwBBQyMQIJJBxaDKgOUfo1Igzg/hEk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,863,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="6861745" Received: from mail-da0-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 18 Mar 2013 10:49:05 +0100 Received: by mail-da0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z20so1244802dae.3 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 02:49:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=vq8Hpd1UH1Z4JT/0OzlAPFNU/wj3cL4iqMNvmDfgXpA=; b=X7wp7GAnMpvb2LiK8JJ2N1x2POyLVQUVKZe5RQFkp16UdyP0yhKQMrK71xLM++MHoJ jHJbaTzeXW6yQ76gZ7jLqDE+8SH6mv8uvwr4i6ZxFNL4yhNAYjQ/pnWZARLF+XkYZX9U MH+/bG45NH0lfciQ7KcJHVQtbOexInUb1QzMcnn4c5mmUc5mXET6Pn7/ztYdJ06IRLVj b70EotcWIyvUmrojR/wQ5Qsx4T8jBUdWotXMf09MUPjhlhmHOZJojIJ4HXPGjH+UQ0VN RYTkWlre+cXO1Ashaj6Gc8dbHy04mo/EPt9MP9xCp5JIMeJX/IaWCKMHwc9ydyGbgP4g 6P5A== X-Received: by 10.66.250.161 with SMTP id zd1mr9459946pac.141.1363600143627; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 02:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fedf:4d21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id kl4sm19624183pbc.31.2013.03.18.02.49.01 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 02:49:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Malcolm Matalka To: adrian.alexander.may@gmail.com Cc: fa.caml@googlegroups.com, caml-list@yquem.inria.fr References: <86572c5b-3307-4f6f-be0b-c710b6291780@googlegroups.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 05:48:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86572c5b-3307-4f6f-be0b-c710b6291780@googlegroups.com> (adrian alexander may's message of "Mon, 18 Mar 2013 02:08:19 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <878v5lca2c.fsf@li195-236.members.linode.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Haskell vs OCaml The biggest advantage for me is Ocaml is simpler than Haskell IMO. adrian.alexander.may@gmail.com writes: > On Wednesday, 13 August 2008 20:49:17 UTC+8, circ ular wrote: >> What are the advantages/disadvantages when comparing OCaml to Haskell? > > case you of > man -> haskell > mouse -> ocaml