From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0CEBB84 for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:03:07 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,735,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="18161377" Received: from 250-96.msr-inria.inria.fr ([193.55.250.96]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 08 Dec 2008 15:03:07 +0100 Message-Id: <87FEDF3A-40A3-458D-B231-B73C354B0390@inria.fr> From: Damien Doligez To: Caml Mailing List In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] caml_atom_table bug still present in ocaml 3.11.0 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:03:07 +0100 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Spam: no; 0.00; damien:01 damien:01 bug:01 ocaml:01 gcc:01 bug:01 doligez:01 doligez:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 inria:06 thread:06 table:93 strange:08 On 2008-12-07, at 20:21, Alexy Khrabrov wrote: > Under the 2005 thread, the resolution, by John Skaller, was, it > should go into the bugtracker; did it, and if not, should it now? :) I don't think it dit, and yes you should add it, although it looks like a strange gcc bug. -- Damien