From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A4007EE51 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:24:39 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of mmatalka@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.220.48; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of mmatalka@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.48 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.220.48; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-pa0-f48.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.220.48; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-pa0-f48.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmEBAGfmW1HRVdwwm2dsb2JhbABDgmaDNL5iFg4BAQEBAQYLCwkUKIJmARseAxImNAEEDxEBBQGINgEDDwGgQIJyjC+Ce4RIChknDVmIfAEFDI8qgyoDphQ/hEo X-IPAS-Result: AmEBAGfmW1HRVdwwm2dsb2JhbABDgmaDNL5iFg4BAQEBAQYLCwkUKIJmARseAxImNAEEDxEBBQGINgEDDwGgQIJyjC+Ce4RIChknDVmIfAEFDI8qgyoDphQ/hEo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,399,1363129200"; d="scan'208";a="11544955" Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 03 Apr 2013 10:24:38 +0200 Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id lj1so770285pab.7 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:24:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=4ETLwsA3Rq6UG/BQdBz+mCOvRwJ9Af4ZuKKuaCpFjlM=; b=n45qXLOf8QZJLeGh0zKhAzn+m1arPIlUqO0fkc7R1TdaB8xT58lAo+Wqas00uXTIIO V1b6ATNXCSFPnHP/A7YSGDARke6+cHdCp2Ypp8PY4Md981q4rW2iEvnqBW901WWUF3zM g05x2DqN2zLH7JhzwxH++MSbt7m+7J1G/SwY7NEktILqY4tiCU4yK/lco+ZkO9QqEzWF dTLeSttJkg+NnQxu+Co5YdmL6Ciuk2Ie/i607N6RJq3eot7oEK7wNx0AWTyTBx9r0GAs zYrw/g836fZoyfhnVQJF5zfpy1Y7ghdh8ZzWl/ylo12HaRtHNcoL26+DzWUTLzxJvQR7 XCUA== X-Received: by 10.66.160.225 with SMTP id xn1mr1803691pab.136.1364977476683; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fedf:4d21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm5944133paf.22.2013.04.03.01.24.34 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:24:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Malcolm Matalka To: caml-list@inria.fr Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:24:31 -0400 Message-ID: <87a9pg9g3k.fsf@li195-236.members.linode.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: [Caml-list] OUD2013 part of CUFP? Last year, OUD was part of CUFP and it worked great. I'm wondering if it's the same this year? /Malcolm