From: Ian Zimmerman <itz@buug.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: equality of Big_ints
Date: 10 Oct 2005 00:12:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87br1yhuxl.fsf@buug.org> (raw)
Is Big_int.eq_big_int the same as polymorphic equality on Big_int.big_int?
In other words, can the same big_int have distinct representations?
I looked at Valerie Menissier-Morain's paper but it seems to refer to
the "old" CAML, so I am afraid to draw any conclusions.
--
"It's not true or not." A reality show producer (real quote)
next reply other threads:[~2005-10-10 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-10 4:12 Ian Zimmerman [this message]
2005-10-10 6:18 ` [Caml-list] " skaller
2005-10-10 7:36 ` Alain Frisch
2005-10-10 15:02 ` skaller
2005-10-10 9:10 ` Thomas Fischbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87br1yhuxl.fsf@buug.org \
--to=itz@buug.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).