caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Malcolm Matalka <mmatalka@gmail.com>
To: Tom Ridge <tom.j.ridge+list@googlemail.com>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Question about garbage collection and impact on performance
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:43:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eh5su6pw.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABooLwP7eSJ5Zc=3uSwCqU4a8Yy6a8bSm_74fQEhN=ceEzpdVw@mail.gmail.com> (Tom Ridge's message of "Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:20:31 +0000")

Have you tried turning on verbose gc so you can determine how much of
your algorithm's time is actually spent in GC?

Tom Ridge <tom.j.ridge+list@googlemail.com> writes:

> Dear caml-list,
>
> I have an OCaml program which I expect to run in time O((n^3) *
> (ln(n))) say. My expectations are based (unrealistically) on ignoring
> garbage collection completely. As inputs get large, the program
> performs worse than I expect.
>
> My question is: is it possible for OCaml's garbage collection to alter
> the time complexity of my program?
>
> If the answer is "yes", then are there any expectations I might have
> about how bad this alteration might be? For example, (without thinking
> about it too hard) it seems unreasonable for GC to turn a polytime
> program into an exponential time program, but is this actually true
> for OCaml's garbage collector?
>
> I have read some material on OCaml's GC, but I did not form any
> intuitions yet about the answers to these questions.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Tom

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-04 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-04 12:20 Tom Ridge
2013-12-04 12:43 ` Malcolm Matalka [this message]
2013-12-04 13:48 ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-12-19 22:47   ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-12-22  2:25     ` Jon Harrop
2013-12-22  3:04       ` David Sheets
2013-12-22 12:43         ` Jeff Schultz
2013-12-22 10:41       ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-12-04 18:09 ` Jon Harrop
2013-12-05  1:09 ` Jacques Garrigue
2013-12-05 10:08   ` Tom Ridge
2013-12-05 10:37     ` Malcolm Matalka
2013-12-05 10:48     ` Michael Hicks
2013-12-05 11:21       ` Tom Ridge
2013-12-05 21:09       ` Jon Harrop

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87eh5su6pw.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=mmatalka@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=tom.j.ridge+list@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).