From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71E7E7EE51 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 20:39:19 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of mmatalka@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.214.52; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of mmatalka@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.214.52; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-bk0-f52.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.214.52; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-bk0-f52.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtMBALr4pFHRVdY0jWdsb2JhbABZgmdRgmFavmCBBxYOAQEBAQcLCwkSBiSCIwEBBAEMFx0BGx0BAwELBgMCCw0CAgUhAgIPAQQPEQEFASITHodcAQMJBgELj1+POItwT4J9hGQKGScMAViHcwEFDIEajUQzB4JBgRMDlzuBKY4yP4Q1 X-IPAS-Result: AtMBALr4pFHRVdY0jWdsb2JhbABZgmdRgmFavmCBBxYOAQEBAQcLCwkSBiSCIwEBBAEMFx0BGx0BAwELBgMCCw0CAgUhAgIPAQQPEQEFASITHodcAQMJBgELj1+POItwT4J9hGQKGScMAViHcwEFDIEajUQzB4JBgRMDlzuBKY4yP4Q1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,759,1363129200"; d="scan'208";a="15983814" Received: from mail-bk0-f52.google.com ([209.85.214.52]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 28 May 2013 20:39:18 +0200 Received: by mail-bk0-f52.google.com with SMTP id mz10so4389087bkb.39 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Za6ZCDWc05znICWWu/1uMuB9uhj5iUZ0T8/rhyKqX1E=; b=hRFoumWpDVZHO//Zpp0fp0Gb9/UqLDrblx+2cgEYRSx/kN42HsZaIyhLwZ2TbWjLk/ 7NJGLd4481k3gj13noYBdChJOXzvT1I00sfUGpqheVb/9veuw9CENnWXxz+SDsXkGc9r 79+YTugQqfoIglwYIceGzEfceZ5tpT1C0tYaoEUZ6Q6JCGphgKprmNte/nIudqMIbdH4 HC7Ypy9WNV6K27oNiy7XiMZSDTNemanBFQqVAZqAdhXhVyQ4j++wp2XRgckC/FMdfnsv W/4JED1AmF9A4r2wSP6SqY3hMzUmoTrmX3FstAFNiPzofnj1kTHeemNB1mPxow8umDIi uFNA== X-Received: by 10.204.237.130 with SMTP id ko2mr4456089bkb.154.1369766358388; Tue, 28 May 2013 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe70:2696]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id es13sm10643937bkc.8.2013.05.28.11.39.17 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 May 2013 11:39:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Malcolm Matalka To: "Mr. Herr" Cc: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20130523235355.GI6510@siouxsie> <20130526150008.GA2014@siouxsie> <20130526234911.41866xca7wgoirfb@webmail.in-berlin.de> <51A30E01.5070300@freenet.de> <51A3C03C.4000205@freenet.de> <51A3C3D6.9020003@etorok.net> <51A3CBBD.8040609@freenet.de> <51A4052F.7000700@riken.jp> <51A4F822.8070407@freenet.de> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 18:39:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: <51A4F822.8070407@freenet.de> (Herr's message of "Tue, 28 May 2013 20:32:02 +0200") Message-ID: <87fvx7q78q.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Problems to get larger user base ... (Re: [Caml-list] OCaml's variables) Yes, I think that is a poor metric. I like that opam installs locally. I don't really want my sysadmin deciding which libraries I'm allowed to use. /M "Mr. Herr" writes: > Am 28.05.2013 03:15, schrieb Francois Berenger: >> On 05/28/2013 06:10 AM, Mr. Herr wrote: >>> >>> Am 27.05.2013 22:36, schrieb T=C3=83=C2=B6r=C3=83=C2=B6k Edwin: >>>> On 05/27/2013 11:21 PM, Mr. Herr wrote: >>>>> Am 27.05.2013 10:37, schrieb Fabrice Le Fessant: >>>>>> Note that it does not need to be done by the OCaml developers themse= lves, >>>>>> anybody can create a project on Github/Gitorious/etc. and start writ= ing some >>>>>> documentation on a module that he likes and have it published somew= here... >>>>> hint, hint! Yes, sure. I was looking for tools that would insert the = example >>>>> code into the document, run it, and insert the result as well, some s= ort of >>>>> advanced literate programming. >>>> If you are writing some documentation in HTML then Stog's ocaml sessio= ns might >>>> be useful: >>>> http://zoggy.github.io/stog/posts/ocaml-sessions.html >>>> >>>> >>> Okay, let's see, it is not in GODI, have to check it. >> >> stog is in OPAM at least, if that help: >> >> > hmm, I tried OPAM, but it installed without choice in my home directory. = This is > normally a MS win habit. Linux is a server, there must be a server wide i= nstall somehow. > > I posed one question about it, got no answer, and concluded it is a toy s= ystem. > > Am I too harsh? I think it should (and could) be easier for starters. > > /Str.