From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Brian Hurt <bhurt@spnz.org>,
caml-list@yquem.inria.fr, William Lovas <wlovas@stwing.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] STM support in OCaml
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:26:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fylpovdi.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141855594.23909.63.camel@budgie.wigram> (skaller@users.sourceforge.net's message of "Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:06:34 +1100")
> I have no idea if Linux, for example, running SMP kernel,
> is smart enough to know if a mutex is shared between two
> processing units or not: AFAIK Linux doesn't support
> interprocess mutex.
Uhm, Linux and GNU libc do support them for quite some time (many
years if you used one of the enterprise variants which backported them
to Linux 2.4).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-11 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-07 16:18 Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-07 16:50 ` [Caml-list] " Sebastian Egner
2006-03-07 17:44 ` Michael Hicks
2006-03-08 0:37 ` Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-08 5:05 ` Erick Tryzelaar
2006-03-11 19:43 ` Deadlock free locking scheme (was: Re: [Caml-list] STM support in OCaml) David MENTRE
2006-03-07 17:15 ` [Caml-list] STM support in OCaml skaller
2006-03-07 19:05 ` Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-08 0:52 ` skaller
2006-03-08 7:08 ` Bardur Arantsson
2006-03-08 10:38 ` [Caml-list] " Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-08 19:36 ` William Lovas
2006-03-08 20:45 ` Brian Hurt
2006-03-08 21:14 ` Paul Snively
2006-03-08 22:06 ` skaller
2006-03-08 22:10 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2006-03-08 23:48 ` skaller
2006-03-09 7:45 ` Andrae Muys
2006-03-09 9:18 ` David Brown
2006-03-08 22:11 ` Brian Hurt
2006-03-08 23:05 ` Lodewijk Vöge
2006-03-09 3:13 ` Brian Hurt
2006-03-08 23:45 ` Robert Roessler
2006-03-09 0:23 ` skaller
2006-03-09 3:19 ` Brian Hurt
2006-03-09 4:32 ` skaller
2006-03-09 10:38 ` John Chu
2006-03-09 16:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-03-11 15:26 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2006-03-08 10:11 [Caml-list] " yoann padioleau
2006-03-08 10:41 ` Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-08 12:23 ` skaller
2006-03-08 23:02 ` Asfand Yar Qazi
2006-03-09 0:36 ` skaller
2006-03-08 11:32 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2006-03-08 12:04 ` skaller
2006-03-08 19:22 ` Dan Grossman
2006-03-08 22:10 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fylpovdi.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de \
--to=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=bhurt@spnz.org \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=wlovas@stwing.upenn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).