From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <goswin-v-b@web.de>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A02BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 19 May 2010 18:49:39 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtcDANOz80vZSMDqkWdsb2JhbACddRUBAQEBCQsKBxEDH75XhRAE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,264,1272837600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="63101746"
Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 19 May 2010 18:49:39 +0200
Received:  from smtp01.web.de  ( [172.20.0.243])
	by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BAD150EBB1C;
	Wed, 19 May 2010 18:49:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [78.43.204.177] (helo=frosties.localdomain)
	by smtp01.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(WEB.DE 4.110 #4)
	id 1OEmSf-0005sA-00; Wed, 19 May 2010 18:49:37 +0200
Received: from mrvn by frosties.localdomain with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <goswin-v-b@web.de>)
	id 1OEmSl-0005RJ-Fz; Wed, 19 May 2010 18:49:43 +0200
From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: "David Allsopp" <dra-news@metastack.com>
Cc: "'Eray Ozkural'" <examachine@gmail.com>,
	"'Michael Ekstrand'" <michael@elehack.net>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: about OcamIL
References: <w2t320e992a1005051158pcdb30e5w48409aa8b6e464e4@mail.gmail.com>
	<088201caf1ce$b5060cb0$1f122610$@com>
	<20100512151137.26894ywcpv71ixvk@imp.ovh.net>
	<012601caf351$e9a362e0$bcea28a0$@com>
	<44A730DD-54EB-4A1C-BD1A-6E9EFB31B5A2@x9c.fr>
	<01f001caf536$c923b4c0$5b6b1e40$@com>
	<20100517095327.14271x0lnao43sao@imp.ovh.net>
	<002001caf6e8$b408ed90$1c1ac8b0$@com>
	<20100519094634.63006zi1h04x95z4@imp.ovh.net>
	<ht0i3c$adr$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<AANLkTimdKIXP8IauhaaMEpEhpGLXgu_kIO_GPeSRKVkO@mail.gmail.com>
	<002d01caf758$1ff14a10$5fd3de30$@romulus.metastack.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 18:49:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <002d01caf758$1ff14a10$5fd3de30$@romulus.metastack.com> (David
	Allsopp's message of "Wed, 19 May 2010 14:35:18 +0100")
Message-ID: <87iq6ju994.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux, no MULE)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: goswin-v-b@web.de
X-Sender: goswin-v-b@web.de
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/zqKaBHy3j0qp+GEFK/gpBpBcQUyEeJ5yQBAkU
	+/gg7BULg9NmOZeNQ1YEZ91Cq4Ces1A5Fv/0upt+j8dUr1ZGzq
	9XExQ0Sbg=
X-Spam: no; 0.00; eray:01 ozkural:01 python's:01 hash:01 hash:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 ocamlopt:01 bytecode:01 javascript:98 javascript:98 mfg:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 pps:01 

"David Allsopp" <dra-news@metastack.com> writes:

> Eray Ozkural wrote:
>> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Michael Ekstrand <michael@elehack.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes, Python's hash tables are particularly optimized due to their wide
>> > pervasive usage.  When you're testing Python hash tables, you're
>> > really testing a carefully-written, thoroughly-tuned C implementation
>> > of hash tables.
>
> <snip>
>
>> That being said, I think getting anything to run on JVM is a remarkable
>> achievement! It would have been so cool to be able to run ocaml code
>> inside a web browser. :) There are unfortunately few alternatives for
>> running code inside a browser.
>
> There are two pretty viable alternatives for running OCaml code in a web
> browser - ocamljs[1] is a JavaScript backend for ocamlopt and O'Browser[2]
> which is a JavaScript implementation of the OCaml bytecode interpreter (or
> VM, as it's been called in this thread).
>
>
> David
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/ocamljs
> [2] http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~canou/obrowser/tutorial

Or NaCl I think it wascalled. Someone mentioned that some time ago here.

MfG
        Goswin