From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <goswin-v-b@web.de>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAD2BC57
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Sat, 15 May 2010 04:16:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlMFAL+g7UvZSMDqe2dsb2JhbACSBIwAFQEBFiIDH71fhRAE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,234,1272837600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="62849917"
Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 15 May 2010 04:16:20 +0200
Received:  from smtp05.web.de  ( [172.20.4.166])
	by fmmailgate03.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6A91504D583
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 15 May 2010 04:16:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [78.43.204.177] (helo=frosties.localdomain)
	by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(WEB.DE 4.110 #4)
	id 1OD6vC-0002a3-00
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Sat, 15 May 2010 04:16:10 +0200
Received: from mrvn by frosties.localdomain with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <goswin-v-b@web.de>)
	id 1OD6vG-0004Uc-Sn
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Sat, 15 May 2010 04:16:15 +0200
From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL
References: <w2t320e992a1005051158pcdb30e5w48409aa8b6e464e4@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100512151137.26894ywcpv71ixvk@imp.ovh.net>
	<012601caf351$e9a362e0$bcea28a0$@com>
	<87fx1uh5r5.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
	<AANLkTimi-r33ze7oyRr2mu29kxUUs997lnHwKTXaUBjN@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilevqlmv-4FuDypPUX0zavErBkOd_N-7OusYxoY@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimUajuA3nWuamWNv9v8N2-1syU3S4ltj4Gt0exj@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik-EuZRmX8VKMdAIsO_t8JGHvS6F9TPVLkohed8@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilfCK7lSw-aXl2vgH6WJETU-UbK4UGN8GkshcmF@mail.gmail.com>
	<49505E67-4974-4F0B-A6B7-0E87214E92BB@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinTiW9XccZ6BCrlipdEWKJG4oMlPua9jaTW6NXl@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100515104348.7c6b4fd2.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 04:16:14 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20100515104348.7c6b4fd2.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> (Erik de Castro
	Lopo's message of "Sat, 15 May 2010 10:43:48 +1000")
Message-ID: <87iq6p7vv5.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux, no MULE)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: goswin-v-b@web.de
X-Sender: goswin-v-b@web.de
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1//DoTJt7EZSIkHP03xI8tTmYVLw5pb53f8Yeuo
	fZmTmFvVvajhcKMt68dhPsDxSbUJe3cTBDKSsHJ5MP8e5Z8nrd
	FQu459sOo=
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 mfg:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 writes:01 emulate:01 supported:02 overhead:04 erik:04 written:07 business:90 business:90 environment:10 environment:10 mle:13 

Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> writes:

> ben kuin wrote:
>
>> I assume it's save to say that most today (business) critical
>> applications have to be written in a vm supported language.

Hardly any business today has an inhomogene environment. And if the
environment is homogene then the vm gives you 0 advantage. It just costs
you overhead to emulate.

MfG
        Goswin