From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA14709; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:45:08 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA15641 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:45:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA07616 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:12:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mallaury.noc.nerim.net (mallaury.noc.nerim.net [62.4.17.82]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g9LACi503392 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:12:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from chinon (jmarant.net1.nerim.net [62.212.105.6]) by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CB162E22 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:12:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by chinon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F413E80CEDA; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:12:43 +0200 (CEST) To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Announcement: SpamOracle References: <20020826151138.A32572@pauillac.inria.fr> <20021020104354.GA11059@iliana> <20021020204946.GP31578@cs.unibo.it> <87vg3wvn8b.fsf@marant.org> <20021021093732.GB3139@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> From: jmarant@nerim.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?J=E9r=F4me?= Marant) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:12:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20021021093732.GB3139@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> (Markus Mottl's message of "Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:37:32 +0200") Message-ID: <87n0p82j8k.fsf@marant.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Markus Mottl writes: > Though this is probably quite obvious anyway, I'd like to point out that > it is really important that all of the good and spam mails are the ones > that you have personally received. If you just take any kind of spam or > good mails, performance will definitely suffer. This is exactly what I did. > If you absolutely don't want to miss good mails, you'll have to regularly > look at your spam folder. Even in this case spamoracle is very helpful, Of course, I always have a look to the spam box in order not to remove good mails. > because it decreases total entropy, i.e. makes it easier for you to > classify things with your own eyes. I won't spend my time on such experiments anyway. Spamassassin works fine for me with no addtional configuration. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners