Re: [Caml-list] OCaml vs Ada and/or GUI options

[Ivan Gotovchits <ivg@ieee.org>]

Adrien Nader <adrien@notk.org> writes:

>>   4. The use of callbacks everywhere looks to me like writing
>> spaghetti code. I still hope somebody will write an
>> API/Framework/whatever were one writes declaratively how the GUI
>> should react and interact with application code, and all the needed
>> code is generated automatically. Adobe had such a tool at one point
>> for its internal use (i.e. for its applications). I don't know if
>> reactive approaches would help in that regard.
>
> I'm afraid you'll find the same issues everywhere. One way or another
> it'll boil down to the same thing.

Consider using lwt-glib integration. You can transform any callback to a
function returning lwt. You even go futher and use Lwt_react to
transform glib events to declarative events and signals of (Lwt)React.

-- 
         (__) 
         (oo) 
   /------\/ 
  / |    ||   
 *  /\---/\ 
    ~~   ~~   
...."Have you mooed today?"...