From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA25236; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 17:38:45 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA27320 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 17:38:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from qrnik.knm.org.pl (paf87.warszawa.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.225.87]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i85Fchhx030993 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 17:38:44 +0200 Received: from qrczak by qrnik.knm.org.pl with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1C3z6F-0004fr-00; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 17:38:39 +0200 To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net Cc: caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Announcing the OMake build system version 0.9.1 References: <4139ECD3.1050708@cs.caltech.edu> <001e01c492a6$872c7280$19b0e152@warp> <413A0921.7030607@ntlworld.com> <413A1E89.10806@libertysurf.fr> <1094361655.3352.476.camel@pelican.wigram> <87hdqc3kfr.fsf@qrnik.zagroda> <1094396893.3352.635.camel@pelican.wigram> From: "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" Mail-Followup-To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net, caml-list Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 17:38:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1094396893.3352.635.camel@pelican.wigram> (skaller@users.sourceforge.net's message of "06 Sep 2004 01:08:13 +1000") Message-ID: <87sm9w4tfk.fsf@qrnik.zagroda> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 413B3303.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 marcin:01 'qrczak':01 kowalczyk:01 qrczak:01 sourceforge:01 elide:01 interscript:01 fixpoint:01 fixpoint:01 iterated:01 marcin:01 kowalczyk:01 qrczak:01 writes:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk skaller writes: > The issue is how you determine what you can elide > from the build. > > Interscript currently does do just what I said and it works. I don't understand. *How* does it know what to rebuild and how? > Of course but you're missing the point... Indeed I am. I don't see how do you specify how code should be rebuilt. > What I mean is: make doesn't work, it's entirely wrong, so it isn't > even a candidate for a build paradigm. Make works for me. What method of specifying building instructions do you propose instead? > Fixpoint iteration works and is universal. What does "fixpoint iteration" mean in this concept? What is iterated? -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk \__/ qrczak@knm.org.pl ^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners