From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA02616; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:13:32 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA02891 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:13:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from mwinf0402.wanadoo.fr (smtp4.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.27]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i25FDTUM012821 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:13:29 +0100 Received: from vanicat.homelinux.org (ca-bordeaux-16-205.w80-8.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.8.88.205]) by mwinf0402.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4B279800084 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:13:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from moi by vanicat.homelinux.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1AzH0y-0002ve-Pj for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 16:13:28 +0100 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Test case syntax error References: <200403051244.i25Ci2d2003504@no-knife.mit.edu> From: Remi Vanicat Mail-Copy-To: never Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 16:13:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200403051244.i25Ci2d2003504@no-knife.mit.edu> (John Carr's message of "Fri, 05 Mar 2004 07:44:02 -0500") Message-ID: <87u113z5rb.dlv@vanicat.homelinux.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 jfc:01 toplevel:01 writes:01 remi:01 remi:01 vanicat:01 vanicat:01 syntax:02 let:04 let:04 carr:05 definition:06 type:07 john:09 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 57 John Carr writes: >> let _ = is not a syntactically valid expression. You have >> to write let _ = in instead. > > Except at toplevel, where you must use the first form instead of the > second. "let _ = " is not a expression, it is a definition. The same way "type = " is. -- Rémi Vanicat ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners