caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Remi Vanicat <remi.vanicat@laposte.net>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Question about string ref and Hashtbl.
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 04:13:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vfl0xlay.dlv@vanicat.homelinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040320000558.71279.qmail@web40311.mail.yahoo.com> (Bob Bailey's message of "Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:05:58 -0800 (PST)")

Bob Bailey <bobbaileyjr@yahoo.com> writes:

> That's an interesting idea.  SO the key string and the value string
> will really point to the same location in memory.
>
> So if I did (string,string ref) Hashtbl.t, then the string ref would
> be a pointer to the key string. 

It is a strange thing that the key and value of a location of the
Hashtbl are really the same thing. 

Mmm, i believe that I've understood what you want to do, and if you
don't want to modify  the value associated with a key, then you don't
need to use the type ref. the type ref have one and only one interest:
you can modify it.

> Would that allow me to compare two
> string ref variables together?  Would the comparason of the locations
> of the strings mean I wouldn't have to do a full string compare?
>
> so in my module type index = string ref type dict = (string,index)
> Hashtbl.t
>
> So in the case of let a = Hashtbl.find dict "a" let b = Hashtbl.find
> dict "a"
>
> would a==b be the same as !a == !b?  

Well if 

let a = Hashtbl.find dict "a"

and

let b = Hashtbl.find dict "a"

and if the Hashtbl have not been modified between the two call, then
a==b. and if a==b then !a == !b. but beware :

# let st = "test";;
val st : string = "test"
# let a = ref st;;
val a : string ref = {contents = "test"}
# let b = ref st;;
val b : string ref = {contents = "test"}
# a == b;;
- : bool = false
# !a == !b;;
- : bool = true

> Also, would a==b be a faster comparason in this case?

No, == test the equality of the pointer to the value, so it take the
same time for all type. By the way :

# "test" == "test";;
- : bool = false

May be you want to use =, but with (=) then (a = b) is equal to 
(!a = !b) for all reference a and b, and the evaluation time are more
or less the same (may be (!a = !b) is faster, but I won't bet on it).
-- 
Rémi Vanicat

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-20  3:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20040320.075814.105434271.yoriyuki@mbg.ocn.ne.jp>
2004-03-20  0:05 ` Bob Bailey
2004-03-20  3:13   ` Remi Vanicat [this message]
2004-03-22  8:32   ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2004-03-19 22:03 Bob Bailey
2004-03-19 22:48 ` Karl Zilles
2004-03-19 23:58   ` Bob Bailey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87vfl0xlay.dlv@vanicat.homelinux.org \
    --to=remi.vanicat@laposte.net \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).