From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA08024; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:34:26 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f
Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA08121 for <caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr>; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:34:24 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204])
	by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i6KBYNEV007217
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:34:23 +0200
Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 72so382859rnf
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 04:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.3.70 with SMTP id 70mr36386rnc;
        Tue, 20 Jul 2004 04:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <891bd33904072004342049a188@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:34:22 -0400
From: Yaron Minsky <yminsky@gmail.com>
Reply-To: yminsky@cs.cornell.edu
To: Nicolas Cannasse <warplayer@free.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Slight parsing difference with/without -pp "camlp4o"
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr, Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
In-Reply-To: <003701c46e49$d5099720$ef01a8c0@warp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <20040720092114.GA11136@redhat.com> <003701c46e49$d5099720$ef01a8c0@warp>
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 40FD033F.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr
X-Spam: no; 0.00; yaron:01 minsky:01 yminsky:01 caml-list:01 -pp:01 camlp:01 bug:01 camlp:01 dud:99 2004:99 cannasse:01 warplayer:01 3.07:01 ocamlc:01 ocamlc:01 
Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Precedence: bulk

This is a bug that's already been reported to caml-bugs, and the list,
though I haven't seen any response to it.  Basically, camlp4o.opt is a
dud --- it always returns nothing, so anything you compile with it
comes out doing nothing.  camlp4o works as usual, though.

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:08:05 +0200, Nicolas Cannasse <warplayer@free.fr> wrote:
> > [This is with OCaml 3.07 - not checked with 3.08]
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------- pptest.ml --
> > let f = fun (year, week) as yw -> 1
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > $ ocamlc -c pptest.ml
> > File "pptest.ml", line 1, characters 25-27:
> > Syntax error
> >
> > But ...
> >
> > $ ocamlc -pp "camlp4o" -c pptest.ml
> > $
> >
> > Rich.
> 
> Yesterday I reported a bug to the OCaml Team :
> The following :
> 
> SomeUnknownModule.f()
> 
> is successfully compiled when using camlp4o.opt.exe under Win32 MSVC.
> Looks like an empty syntax tree is returned when some error is raised.
> It might be the same problem, try to shift to camlp4 bytecode built in order
> to fix this.
> 
> Regards,
> Nicolas Cannasse
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
>

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners