From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yminsky@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDFABC0A
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri,  8 Jun 2007 04:26:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.228])
	by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l582Quah003851
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 04:26:56 +0200
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so640210nze
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=Ia21sGg5Sxj3oPoYvrDfRjdRfL+2hrRtTZMpzt7Cm7RJm8MgD+Ya8M5igxhmMbmWU4habVuT/AHjYy3qH85wxPVwRj86edpDZ5lZEdp6FzMn+JkLgPKqDDT3qXFYQYXnt0bSEjofAjRgyxlC+iHNMu5V5obgYdtmS17VDIbSlpE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=cpo98hc8ibH37m5sJfWwVzxrSEQrs/rhnZQ7UsCkPWbBMhmPIIiZqoMhCMIm77SOGVbR/LcxE7iXNBTLhbGVbTwo/exjE3XiKxUWuCJJk32JzqctWzj2vHCVCq+U03hHveP3xxd2koaec9/I72Z3B82MOYXH89IR4vpEklXbeQ4=
Received: by 10.114.15.1 with SMTP id 1mr2102581wao.1181269615637;
        Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.52.9 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <891bd3390706071926v4fdf9c6dob3b4ea70e91b7391@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:26:55 -0400
From: "Yaron Minsky" <yminsky@cs.cornell.edu>
Sender: yminsky@gmail.com
To: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: compiling large file hogs RAM and takes a long time.
Cc: "Jacques Garrigue" <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>, sds@gnu.org,
	caml-list@inria.fr
In-Reply-To: <1181267500.15201.144.camel@rosella.wigram>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_62103_21464094.1181269615609"
References: <4666E11F.6000308@podval.org> <466829A3.2090508@gnu.org>
	 <20070608.100255.84973407.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
	 <1181267500.15201.144.camel@rosella.wigram>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 596eae12c56f91e5
X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4668BE70.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)!
X-Spam: no; 0.00; yaron:01 minsky:01 yminsky:01 variants:01 variants:01 sourceforge:01 sourceforge:01 polymorphic:01 polymorphic:01 wrote:01 wrote:01 constructor:01 constructor:01 caml-list:01 cornell:01 

------=_Part_62103_21464094.1181269615609
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 6/7/07, skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>
> Also .. I suspect the OP is only using polymorphic variants to
> work around the 246 constructor limitation on non-polymorphic variants.
> In this case, they could just use factored non-polymorphic variants.


Actually the OP is using polymorphic variants so that the resulting data can
be stored in a polymap.  So regular variants are not such a good
replacement.

------=_Part_62103_21464094.1181269615609
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 6/7/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">skaller</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:skaller@users.sourceforge.net">skaller@users.sourceforge.net</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>Also .. I suspect the OP is only using polymorphic variants to<br>work around the 246 constructor limitation on non-polymorphic variants.<br>In this case, they could just use factored non-polymorphic variants.</blockquote>
<div><br>Actually the OP is using polymorphic variants so that the resulting data can be stored in a polymap.&nbsp; So regular variants are not such a good replacement.<br></div><br></div><br>

------=_Part_62103_21464094.1181269615609--