Do you have a sense of how hard this would be to fix?  It would be lovely to
have some reasonable namespace control without having to take chunks of the
namespace as all-or-nothing pieces....

y

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Alain Frisch <alain@frisch.fr> wrote:

> David Teller wrote:
>
>> I thought the linker only linked in symbols which were actually used?
>>
>
> No, it is not the case.
>
> The only automatic mechanism for code pruning is at the level of individual
> modules embedded in a library. As soon as you pack, you obtain a monolithic
> module which can only be linked as a whole.
>
> -- Alain
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>